◉ ◉[BETA]

← Dashboard

How much of The Guardian is AI-generated?

12.5%

of sampled content classified AI-generated · 30-day average

⚠ Last measured 2026-07-2226 days ago. The Guardian has not reported new data since; the figure above predates that and is not current.


As of 2026-07-22, 12.5% of content sampled from The Guardian was classified AI-generated by Dead Internet Monitor (30-day volume-weighted average, across 2,475 classified items).


Communities within The Guardian

The 4 communities tracked on this platform, ranked by 30-day AI rate. Each links to its full evidence record — trend, sample size, and methodology.


Embed this number

A live badge — it updates with the measurement. Crimson = ≥2× the internet-wide rate, amber = ≥1.25×, steel = at or below baseline.

The Guardian AI rate — Dead Internet Monitor

Markdown

[![The Guardian AI rate](https://deadinternetmonitor.com/badge/source/guardian.svg)](https://deadinternetmonitor.com/source/guardian)

HTML

<a href="https://deadinternetmonitor.com/source/guardian"><img src="https://deadinternetmonitor.com/badge/source/guardian.svg" alt="The Guardian AI rate — Dead Internet Monitor"></a>

Other platforms

Reddit · Hacker News · Mastodon · Bluesky · YouTube · Stack Overflow · Lobsters · Steam

Compare all platforms, ranked by AI rate →


How this is measured

Each item collected from The Guardian is classified by an LLM as AI-generated, human, or uncertain. The headline figure is the 30-day, volume-weighted share classified AI-generated — high-volume days count proportionally more. Read the full methodology, explore every community on the dashboard, or pull the underlying data from the open data API (CC BY 4.0).