How much of guardian/science is AI-generated?

36.6%

of sampled content classified AI-generated · 30-day average

As of 2026-06-29, 36.6% of content sampled from guardian/science was classified AI-generated by Dead Internet Monitor (30-day volume-weighted average, across 120 classified items).

Sample: 120 classified items (cumulative). The rate is the 30-day, volume-weighted average — the same figure shown on the dashboard.
Versus the internet-wide rate: Dead Internet Monitor's all-source 30-day AI rate is 11.9%. guardian/science runs 3.1× that rate — structurally elevated.
Excluding automated moderation: 37.5% (removes AutoModerator-type posts).
Excluding org-handle syndication: 36.6% (removes verified-org auto-posts).
Dead Internet Index: 18.6.

Embed this number

A live badge — it updates with the measurement. Crimson = ≥2× the internet-wide rate, amber = ≥1.25×, steel = at or below baseline.

Markdown

[![guardian/science AI rate](https://deadinternetmonitor.com/badge/community/guardian.science.svg)](https://deadinternetmonitor.com/community/guardian.science)

HTML

<a href="https://deadinternetmonitor.com/community/guardian.science"><img src="https://deadinternetmonitor.com/badge/community/guardian.science.svg" alt="guardian/science AI rate — Dead Internet Monitor"></a>

How this is measured

Each item collected from guardian/science is classified by an LLM as AI-generated, human, or uncertain. The headline figure is the 30-day, volume-weighted share classified AI-generated — high-volume days count proportionally more. Read the full methodology, explore every community on the dashboard, or pull the underlying data from the open data API (CC BY 4.0).